Talk:Codegenic

As a programmed/RAMCOA system, it comes across as highly insensitive that people are using terms like “coding” and “codegenic.” There are other terms like tech, binary (1s and 0s), HTML, CSS, and numerous other coding scripts. At the very least, edits should be allowed that specify that RAMCOA systems may use terms relating to code to refer to Internal Handlers/Internal Programmers and their own experiences with programming (this isn’t meant to be directed at anyone or be taken too harshly, but there has been discussion in RAMCOA spaces about these terms) -Eternal Paradise

"Coding" is not widely common as a programming-specific term. Even if it was, a lot of systems use computers and similar concepts to describe their experiences, independent of RAMCOA systems. Overlapping use of terms happens all the time with more insular communities, it is not an attack, and very rarely can a community claim a term as theirs and only theirs. The page does specify that it is not referring to programming, and you (and every other wiki user) is free to create pages and link them as related. -LogLot

Eternal Paradise, I think it would be a great idea to add edits specifying use cases for RAMCOA systems. I can absolutely imagine how coding could be an insensitive word for non-ramcoa systems to be using. I hope you're able to reclaim the words you chose to. - Anna, Starscape

Just an addition I forgot before, there is an ongoing discussion among ramcoa survivors and wiki staff on how to handle programming-related terms; we're working on a page that will have policies, guidelines, and a discussion forum for the wider topic /g /info -LogLot (wiki admin)