Talk:Daemonling

Fix page title
Could the title of this page please be amended to "Dæmling"? Tysm!! Lunarsys (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I feel like you know a lot about daemonism. You could be useful to the wiki, but at the same time, you're using it to basically vandalize it. Would you be interested in trying to help out instead of just saying they're not plural when I hear several others saying they are plural? You could be a great help. Thank you. -Ion and Kin, Forestwalk (talk) 21:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, I am not trying to vandalize it and if people feel it should be included here as an adjacent experience that's fine! Daemonism is my special interest and apart from the info segments about it being plural/systemrelated or not, I have also made a lot of corrections of information about this topic that was incorrect, expanded on the pages that we do have and added more up-to-date information. If the concept will be included on the wiki its pages should be correct and in-date. Tysm! Lunarsys (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Where did you hear that daemonism isn't plural? We would like sources. And please feel free to readd the corrections as long as you don't remove the pages or say they aren't plural. Thank you. -Kin, Forestwalk (talk) 22:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * From the main dæmonism community, which coined and developed the concept over the course of many years. A person can be a system and also be a dæmian, or be plural and also be a dæmian (or both or all three), it's just that it's not inherently a plural or system concept. That doesn't mean individual people can't consider it those things or one of those things though. If you look at the main source of information on the concept (The Daemon Page) for example there's no mention at all of plurality or systemhood at all, we would consider that a source. We would also feel that since the concept is on Pluralpedia, the onus would be here for people to link to sources which say that it is plural or systemrelated if that makes sense, as opposed to the opposite.
 * We won't remove the pages and never said that we were going to, instead we raised it for discussion as a query on the talk page, explaining my reasons for why we thought so. To delete them without asking would have been vandalism. And we're happy to re-add the corrections (without the commentary on whether it's plural or system or not). Tysm!! Lunarsys (talk) 22:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That would be wonderful. We would like that. (Re-adding the corrections without the commentary) -Kin, Forestwalk (talk) 22:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If possible please ask any non-dæmian admins and editors then to not revert them again, also we promise not to re-add the commentary. Thankyou -- Luna Lunarsys (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * https://daemonpage.com/faq.php#1
 * However, it can be argued that dæmonism lies somewhere on the plurality spectrum. Plurality covers all the experiences of having multiple headmates, voices or personas in your mind. There is no specific kind of plurality that dæmians identify with - some feel rather separate from their dæmons and identify as multiple systems; some find the description of median system more fitting, which means that they feel like they and their dæmons are separate facets of the same whole. Other dæmians will not consider themselves plural at all, having a strong sense of dæmon being a mental construct, not a developed facet or persona. The experiences can vary strongly from person to person.
 * This is a copy and paste from the FAQ on The Daemon Page, it does actually mention it as possibly considered plural SeaSeekers (talk) 22:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Could the title of this page please be amended to "Dæmling"? Tysm!!
As above, updating the title to this would bring the terminology more up to date. Lunarsys (talk) 22:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)