Fictive: Difference between revisions

From Pluralpedia, the collaborative plurality dictionary
m (2002 usage)
m (→‎LiveJournal: found some more uses in soulbonding spaces)
(46 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| image = fictive.png
| image = fictive.png
| alt =  
| alt =  
| image caption = Flag by [https://yourfavisafictive.tumblr.com/post/184405308841/fictive-pride-flag-sourcecanon-the-place-where yourfavisafictive]
| image caption = Flag by [https://web.archive.org/web/20200216193833/https://yourfavisafictive.tumblr.com/post/184405308841/sourcecanon-the-place-where-it-all-began-the yourfavisafictive]
| synonyms = fictional introject (n.), fiction-sourced (adj.)
| synonyms = fictional introject (n.), fiction-sourced (adj.)
| forms = fictivity (n.)
| forms = fictivity (n.)
Line 25: Line 25:
[[Category:Outsourced & Introject Terms]]
[[Category:Outsourced & Introject Terms]]


'''Fictives''' are [[Headmate|headmates]] based on a fictional [[source]]. Common sources are media like games and books, but almost anything can be a fictive's source, such as original characters or D&D characters created by other [[system]] members.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20211015193158/https://fictionkin.com/wiki/fictives/</ref>
'''Fictives''' are [[Headmate|headmates]] based on a fictional [[source]]. Common sources are media like games and books, but almost anything can be a fictive's source, such as original characters or D&D characters created by other [[system]] members.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20211015193158/https://fictionkin.com/wiki/fictives/ Fictives] on the Fictionkin Wiki, via Wayback Machine, 2021</ref>


== History ==
== History ==
Fictive was previously thought to have been coined in the soulbonding community some time during or before 2004 as a less spiritual way of referring to [[Soulbond|soulbonds]].<ref>https://the-truth-is-outthere.tumblr.com/post/166009638666/the-history-of-the-term-fictive</ref><ref name=":1">https://houseofchimeras.weebly.com/a-history-of-the-fictionkin-community.html</ref><ref>http://www.astraeasweb.net:80/plural/glossary.html </ref> Recent discoveries have led to a much more complicated history. 


In 1988, Jay Martin published ''Who Am I This Time?: Uncovering The Fictive Personality'', a book unpacking how some of the greatest artists "[take] on aspects of fictional characters to compensate for deficiencies in themselves."<ref>https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-03-27-vw-356-story.html </ref> While likely not directly related to the creation of the plural term, it is worth mentioning.  
=== Origin ===
Fictive was previously thought to have been coined in the soulbonding community some time during or before 2004 as a less spiritual way of referring to [[Soulbond|soulbonds]].<ref>[https://the-truth-is-outthere.tumblr.com/post/166009638666/the-history-of-the-term-fictive The history of the term fictive] by LB Lee on Tumblr, reblog by the-truth-is-outthere, c. 2017</ref><ref name=":1">[https://web.archive.org/web/20181218022205/https://houseofchimeras.weebly.com/a-history-of-the-fictionkin-community.html A History of the Fictionkin Community] by House of Chimeras on Weebly, via Wayback Machine, 2018</ref><ref>[http://www.astraeasweb.net:80/plural/glossary.html MPD/DID Glossary] on [[Astraea's Web]], accessed 2022 </ref> Recent discoveries have led to a much more complicated history.


A Pluralpedia editor found a usage of fictive on a fanfiction site. The work in question was first archived in 1999.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/19991128132206/http://wolverineandjubilee.com/fiction/FictivesAttack.htm</ref> On the Fanlore page for fictive, there is a non-plural definition from 2009<ref>https://fanlore.org/wiki/Fictive</ref>, and from there one can be led to the Subreality Café. The first archive of the writing site Subreality Café, made in 1999, defines fictive in its FAQ as "characters from the stories for whom the Cafe was created."<ref name=":0">http://web.archive.org/web/19990830153823/http://www.subreality.com/sc.htm</ref>
In 1988, Jay Martin published ''Who Am I This Time?: Uncovering The Fictive Personality'', a book unpacking how some of the greatest artists "[take] on aspects of fictional characters to compensate for deficiencies in themselves."<ref>[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-03-27-vw-356-story.html ‘Fictive Personalities’ : Author Looks for the Character in All of Us] by Mike Wyma, about author Jay Martin, in the LA Times, 1988 </ref> While likely not directly related to the creation of the plural term, it is worth mentioning. Martin's theory of the fictive personality was later explained as "[p]ropos[ing] that the fictive personality is a personality disturbance in which, in the relative absence or weakness of both normal narcissism and object love, the self strives toward total identification with characters in literary, historical, or mass-media fiction."<ref>[https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-10473-001 Clinical contributions to the theory of the fictive personality.] by Jay Martin, listed on APA PsycNet, published 1984-1985</ref> 
 
A Pluralpedia editor found a usage of fictive on a fanfiction site. The work in question was first archived in 1999.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/19991128132206/http://wolverineandjubilee.com/fiction/FictivesAttack.htm When Fictives Attack] by Mercutio on the Wolverine and Jubilee Page, via Wayback Machine, published 1999 and accessed 2022</ref> On the Fanlore page for fictive, there is a non-plural definition from 2009,<ref>[https://fanlore.org/wiki/Fictive Fictive] on Fanlore, accessed 2022</ref> and from there one can be led to the Subreality Café.  
 
=== Subreality Café ===
The first archive of the writing site Subreality Café, made in 1999, defines fictive in its FAQ as "characters from the stories for whom the Cafe was created."<ref name=":0">[http://web.archive.org/web/19990830153823/http://www.subreality.com/sc.htm Subreality Central] via Wayback Machine, 1999</ref> The concept existed before the website existed, as early as 1997.<ref>[https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comics.fan-fiction/c/nTxJEm_ahHM/m/myaCygUpmZAJ Subreality Setup Part 1/?] by Kielle, in alt.comics.fan-fiction mailing list, 1997</ref>


"If you watched "Who Framed Roger Rabbit," you might get an idea of what fictives are like "off duty." They're like cartoon characters; they can't really die, it only ''looks'' that way in stories, but it can sure tick them off! The only thing a fictive truly fears is his/her writer and readers giving up on their story, thus letting them fade away into non-existence again."<ref name=":0" />
"If you watched "Who Framed Roger Rabbit," you might get an idea of what fictives are like "off duty." They're like cartoon characters; they can't really die, it only ''looks'' that way in stories, but it can sure tick them off! The only thing a fictive truly fears is his/her writer and readers giving up on their story, thus letting them fade away into non-existence again."<ref name=":0" />


In this original definition, fictives are presented as ideas that grow to the point of near sentience. By late 2000, Subreality Café had been redesigned twice, and the writing page now included sections for "Fictives Only," "Fictive/Writer Interactions," and "Fictives About Writers."<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20000612193757/http://www.subreality.com:80/sc.htm</ref><ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20000823041635/http://www.subreality.com/sc.htm</ref> With these changes, it solidified the idea that fictives could act independently of their writers, but these stories were still generally portrayed as pure fiction.  
In this original definition, fictives are presented as ideas that grow to the point of near sentience. By late 2000, Subreality Café (then Subreality Central) had been redesigned twice, and the writing page now included sections for "Fictives Only," "Fictive/Writer Interactions," and "Fictives About Writers."<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20000612193757/http://www.subreality.com:80/sc.htm Subreality Central] via Wayback Machine, 2000</ref><ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20000823041635/http://www.subreality.com/sc.htm Subreality Central] via Wayback Machine, 2000</ref> With these changes, it solidified the idea that fictives could act independently of their writers, but these stories were still generally portrayed as pure fiction.  
 
A metafic titled "Ancient History" brings that a bit into question. "Theoretically, the muses of Subreality had been the basis for his muse. At least, he hoped so. He'd hate to think his mind had pulled her out of nowhere." Before long, Harry, the main character, came home to a girl in his room. The fic also brings up his realization that "all" fans were in some way mentally ill or neurotic.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20010219235807fw_/http://www.subreality.com/sc/fics/ah.htm Ancient History] by Bayeux and Tapestry on the Subreality Cafe, via Wayback Machine, 2001</ref>
 
It's impossible to know how much of Subreality Café was fiction, exaggeration, or genuine. The story that originally spawned the concept, "Subreality Hopscotch," seems to have been a purely fictional piece,<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20010220000127fw_/http://www.subreality.com/sc/fics/sh.htm Subreality Hopscotch] by Kielle on the Subreality Cafe, via Wayback Machine, 2001</ref> but all ideas expand. Most of the works are written in third person, which only complicates perspective more. Kielle, the site's creator, says in the author's note of "Subreality Chronicles" that she's not sure she wrote all of it, which lends itself to the plural end of the soulbond spectrum.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20010220001229fw_/http://www.subreality.com/sc/fics/schronicles.htm Subreality Chronicles] by Anonymous on Subreality Cafe, via the Wayback Machine, 2001</ref> A work on Fanfiction.net from September 2000 stands out for its portrayal of fictives meeting in a room in the writer's head.<ref>[https://www.fanfiction.net/s/67024/1/A-Pause-Before A Pause, Before] by kerithwyn on Fanfiction.net, 2000</ref> Some former Subreality members made [[wikipedia:Livejournal|Livejournal]] posts about their fictives as sentient independently from their Subreality fics.<ref>[https://dragonbat2006.livejournal.com/277324.html Dear Fictives] by dragonbat2006 on LiveJournal and Dreamwidth, 2015</ref><ref>[https://dragonbat2006.livejournal.com/15510.html Do anybody else's fictives channel Gloria Swanson?] by dragonbat2006 on LiveJournal and Dreamwidth, 2006</ref>
 
"Walking in the Rain" has an introduction to the Subreality Café that is indispensable to understanding the origins of fictivity. "Muses are the source of a Writer's Inspiration. The Muse may be a good friend of the Writer, or a long-time enemy; either way, Muses are indispensible [sic] to the Writing community. Some Muses are specifically assigned to Writers, while others are simply imaginary friends that the Writer failed to outgrow."<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20010220001125fw_/http://www.subreality.com/sc/fics/witr.htm Walking In The Rain] by D^Knight on Subreality Cafe, via Wayback Machine, 2006</ref>
 
=== LiveJournal ===
Subreality has an LJ community and has had it since 2001, which may explain the transition of terminology, especially after Subreality founder Kielle's death in 2005.<ref>[https://subreality.livejournal.com/ Subreality fanfic group] on LiveJournal, created 2001</ref> The first mention of fictives in the community appears to have been in May, with it misspelled as "ficitive," in a post which has a comment referring to "how your ficitives get personalities and lifes of their own."<ref>[https://subreality.livejournal.com/3420.html Ever want to tell a ficitive to go get laid?] by Nisie in the Subreality community on LiveJournal, 2001</ref> User Beverly McIntyre made a separate journal for her fictional character Dakota in early 2001, referencing SC in the post, and tagged it as fictives.<ref>[https://beverly-mcintyr.livejournal.com/11237.html Oh, what a beautiful mooorning. Oh, what a beautiful daayyyy. Something something sooooomething...] by beverly-mcintyr on LiveJournal, 2001</ref> An earlier post of hers referenced a "fictive [fictional character]" being mad at her.<ref>[https://beverly-mcintyr.livejournal.com/5970.html Hmm. Random thought.] by beverly-mcintyr on LiveJournal, 2001</ref> Subreality has been references a few times in soulbonding spaces on other sites, including Blurty<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20050504173412/http://blurty.com/userinfo.bml?user=espoir] user profile on Blurty, via Wayback Machine, with tags "multiplicity," "soulbonding," and "subreality," 2005</ref> and SoulBond Sanctuary,<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20030916072607/http://pub51.ezboard.com/ftheswordandserpentfrm3?page=2 Page 2] of Soulbond Sanctuary forum in the Sword and Serpent Tavern, a message board with many ties to the multiple community and which features a number of comparisons and connections between the concepts, via Wayback Machine, 2003</ref> in these cases with nearly direct links to the extended multiple community. SoulBond Sanctuary also saw fictive being used as an adjective when describing soulbonds, with the creation of "fictive characters."<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20020829204159/http://pub51.ezboard.com/ftheswordandserpentfrm3.showMessageRange?start=21&stop=40&topicID=18.topic Re: Where does one start?], comment by Mousse9, in SoulBond Sanctuary on the Sword and Serpent Tavern forum, via Wayback Machine, 2001</ref>
 
In 2001, plural Sethrenn posted on their LiveJournal about [[Soulbond|soulbonding]] and tagged it with "fictivity," though that may have been added later. "There's a limit, I think. Even in fan culture. You can only talk about SBs and characters in your head so far, only take it so seriously, before other people start to back off and write you off as a raving loony. [...] It's interesting how, on a much smaller scale, the backlash in the fan community against SBing in a way mirrors the psych backlash against multiplicity, doesn't it?"<ref>[https://sethrenn.livejournal.com/829.html ...There's a limit, I think.] by sethrenn on LiveJournal, 2001</ref>  Fictive was occasionally shortened to "fic."<ref>[https://archiveofourown.org/works/12813/chapters/16378 The Long Road] by wanderlustlover on Archive Of Our Own, 2009</ref>
 
In May 2002, DeadJournal user dende listed their interests as including "fanfiction, fictives," and "plushies named after fictives."<ref>[https://dende.deadjournal.com/profile?mode=full dende's profile] on DeadJournal, accessed 2022 </ref> The LiveJournal muse community wildfictives was created in October 2002 and is titled "The Fictional Characters in CK's Head." Individual characters had their own blogs and the description states that they are "all fictional" but "each have our own distinct personalities."<ref>[https://wildfictives.livejournal.com/profile wildfictives community profile] on LiveJournal, accessed 2022</ref> They would have long discussions, seemingly between the fictives, about their organization and leadership.<ref>[https://wildfictives.livejournal.com/45532.html Right, then. Consensus time.] by burntfeathers on the wildfictives LiveJournal, 2004</ref> One post reads, "Y'know, I'm aware I'm fictional. All the things I've known and done and thought are just [[Source|a dream someone's dreamt]], no more tangible than a few pieces of paper, and some binary data... but I still [[Exomemory|retain ''memory'']]."<ref>[https://wildfictives.livejournal.com/42694.html I almost feel like throwing a tantrum today.] by the5thwheel on the wildfictives LiveJournal, 2004</ref> This community may be one of the first existing usages of the term fictive in a [[Plurality|plural]] sense, but there's no way of knowing how much of the content was simply roleplay. 
 
The term was later adopted by other [[Plurality|plural]] groups, but it is unknown when exactly. It is now widely used beyond its original coinage. Some members of the multiplicity LiveJournal community discussed terms describing fictive and adjacent experiences in 2004, describing "fictives" as "oh, media people in your head."<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20221114151133/https://multiplicity.livejournal.com/170041.html Random question from an apparent "oldbie"...] by eclectic on the multiplicity LiveJournal, via Wayback Machine, 2004</ref> One soulbonder using the tag "fictive" in 2005, and a few followed after,<ref>[https://multiplicity.livejournal.com/327534.html On Names, Identities, and Soulbonding] by our_haven on the multiplicity LiveJournal, 2005</ref><ref>[https://multiplicity.livejournal.com/tag/fictives Fictives tag] on the multiplicity LiveJournal, accessed 2022</ref> and if it can be counted, "fictivity" was used in a comment in 2006.<ref>[https://multiplicity.livejournal.com/582201.html?thread=8977721#t8977721 The problems with being fiction-sourced...] comment by sethrenn on the multiplicity LiveJournal, 2006</ref> There are records of similar concerns about "faking" fictivity in LiveJournal communities as have been prevalent recently.<ref>[https://sethrenn.livejournal.com/197223.html I dunno, maybe if we join this, it'll get people off the idea that we're biased against fictives in some way?] by sethrenn on LiveJournal, 2006</ref><ref>[https://dreamwriteremmy.livejournal.com/132330.html lots of things] by dreamwriteremmy on LiveJournal, 2011</ref><ref>[https://thebrokenarrows.livejournal.com/5904.html 101714] by thebrokenarrows on LiveJournal, 2014</ref> A multiple on LJ in 2006 said that "there were places online where people didn't talk about multiplicity strictly in terms of trauma," but "other worlds, walk-ins, fictives and the like were rarely discussed at all."<ref>[https://sethrenn.livejournal.com/158977.html FYI, the question about Javascript] by sethrenn on LiveJournal, 2006</ref> In 2009, an introduction in the pagan_multiples community identified many members of a system as fictives, clarifying that they "started as soulbonds."<ref>[https://pagan-multiples.livejournal.com/2526.html Persona System introduction] by thegathered on the pagan-multiples LiveJournal, 2009</ref> It was added to Fanlore's soulbonding page in October 2010, stating that it was used because soulbond "devolved from its original meaning into something casual and flippant."<ref>[https://fanlore.org/w/index.php?title=Soulbond_(trope)&direction=next&oldid=190137 Soulbond (Trope) edit history] 3 October 2010 by KTJ on Fanlore</ref>
 
=== Empowered Multiplicity ===
[[Pavilion]] added fictive under their definition of soulbond in mid-2008, which was mirrored on [[Astraea's Web]].<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20080915201316/http://www.karitas.net/pavilion/glossary.html A Suggested Glossary] on Pavilion, via Wayback Machine, 2008</ref> At the same time, Astraea's Web altered their page on controversies to include the term fictive, which was defined as "a serious connection to a real presence with a fictional source" and pitted against soulbond.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20090517085825/http://www.astraeasweb.net:80/plural/controversy.html Controversial Issues in Multiplicity] on [[Astraea's Web]], via Wayback Machine, 2009</ref> The first archive of [[Ex Uno Plures]]'s glossary in 2009 redirects fictive to soulbond.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20090503123533/http://www.exunoplures.info/stickyterms.html Soulbonds, alters, headmates, people, colleagues, where does it end? And which ones should I use?] by Hess on Ex Uno Plures, via Wayback Machine, 2009</ref> An essay archived from 2008 lists terms related to soulbonds, naming, "Soulbonds, Fictives, guests, non-humans, Furries, Otakukin, Otherkin, Therians, imaginary friends, archetypes, in-sourced, out-sourced, characters, role-playing, muses, and whatever else," but notes that fictive is reminiscent of "a fake person."<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20150305060614/https://spicetea.weebly.com/omgsoulbonds.html Essays - Conflicts with the word "Soulbonds"] by LeAnne of the Silhouettes on Weebly, via Wayback Machine, written 2008, 2015</ref> Kasiya's personal site listed it in a 2008 archive as a recent synonym of soulbond that "we personally feel [...] is even worse."<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20081012033014/http://kasiya.net/site/files/g-general.html Glossary] on Kasiya, via Wayback Machine, 2008</ref> It was listed separately on Pavilion by 2009, based on Astraea's mirror,<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20090129080620/http://astraeasweb.net:80/plural/glossary.html Multiple Personality Glossary] on [[Astraea's Web]], via Wayback Machine, 2009</ref> where it was defined as a "person from fictional sources, who is adopted into the [[Headspace|mindspace]] of another person."<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20120121065925/http://www.karitas.net:80/pavilion/glossary.html A Suggested Glossary] on Pavilion, via Wayback Machine, 2012</ref>


A metafic titled "Ancient History" brings that a bit into question. "Theoretically, the muses of Subreality had been the basis for his muse. At least, he hoped so. He'd hate to think his mind had pulled her out of nowhere." Before long, Harry, the main character, came home to a girl in his room. The fic also brings up his realization that "all" fans were in some way mentally ill or neurotic.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20010219235807fw_/http://www.subreality.com/sc/fics/ah.htm</ref>
=== Tumblr ===
Dreamwidth user Tidepools said in 2010 that they were a multiple system with soulbonds/fictives.<ref>[https://tidepools.dreamwidth.org/452.html Nothing to see] by tidepools on Dreamwidth, 2010</ref> "Non-fictive" was being used alongside [[thoughtform]] on LJ in 2011.<ref>[https://solipsistful.livejournal.com/9476.html our terminology] by solipsistful on LiveJournal, 2011</ref> Tumblr user solipsistful identified their system as having fictives in (c.) 2012.<ref>[https://solipsistful.tumblr.com/post/12476463681 Continuing from yesterdaaay.] by collective solipsism on Tumblr, "11 years ago" (2012)</ref> Fictive was used in an October 2011 fanfic on Archive Of Our Own, which was also tagged with [[plurality]] and [[multiplicity]].<ref>[https://archiveofourown.org/works/267858 The Liberty] by TheColorBlue (user-locked) on Archive Of Our Own, 2011</ref> A 2012 article about Draven (infamous in some fandom spaces) defined fictive as "like an otherkin where the true, internal identity is a fictional character," with Draven identifying as a "fictive [[singlet]]."<ref>[https://www.gawker.com/5940947/from-otherkin-to-transethnicity-your-field-guide-to-the-weird-world-of-tumblr-identity-politics From Otherkin to Transethnicity: Your Field Guide to the Weird World of Tumblr Identity Politics] by Max Read on Gawker, 2012</ref> A Tumblr conversation about soulbonder terminology considered "fictive" to be from the multiplicity community and showed preference for terms like [[outsourced]] and [[insourced]], which they said were used by soulbonders.<ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/okamp-blog/23921179043/terminology-re-visisted-lee Terminology re-visisted. (Lee)] by darkstarsystem, reblog by okamp-blog on Tumblr (2012)</ref> Uses on Twitter existed but were primarily mocking and insulting.<ref>[https://twitter.com/Pink_Poodle/status/170940339933286400 okay i had enough of soulbonding fictive mutltiple otherkin today] by Pink_Poodle on Twitter (2012)</ref><ref>[https://twitter.com/thalassarche/status/211624988845948928 seriously though the multiple/otherkin/fictive communities are toxic as fuck] by thalassarche on Twitter (2012)</ref><ref>[https://twitter.com/vhbonesy/status/290484672864083969 dear tumblr] by vhbonesy Twitter (2013)</ref><ref>[https://twitter.com/f0rf0r/status/414132097125580800 I am a fictive Chiss Sithlord otherkin temporarily slumming it in Corporate IT.] by f0rf0r on Twitter (2013)</ref> The Tumblr tags fictive and fictives were seeing usage by multiples and fictionkin in 2011.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20111226085518/http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/fictives Fictives] tag on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2011</ref><ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20111226234213/http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/fictive Fictive] on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2011</ref> One early usage of the word on the PsychForums occured in 2012, in a list of terms taken from a glossary page of a DID site, used the term "fictive alter,"<ref>[https://www.psychforums.com/dissociative-identity/topic103352.html#p1003480 Re: Question adressed to The Hawk] by tomboy24 on the PsychForums forum for Dissociative Identity (2012), citing [https://web.archive.org/web/20130809054641/https://www.dissociative-identity-disorder.org/terminology.html Terms for Dissociative Identity Disorder], first archive (2013)</ref> but its first appearance seems to have been as a noun in December 2011.<ref>[https://www.psychforums.com/dissociative-identity/topic80020.html#p683089 Re: Alters, when did you start naming them?] by SinnyBaby on PsychForums, Dissociative Identity forum (2011)</ref><ref>[https://www.psychforums.com/dissociative-identity/topic88451.html#p792553 Re: Can alters come from media images??] by Caecandy on PsychForums, Dissociative Identity forum (2012)</ref> It seems to have been introduced to the (unrelated) CwDID forum in 2015<ref>[https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/copingwithdissociativeidentitydisorder/viewtopic.php?p=423861#p423861 My name is Lily] by Tea on the Coping with Dissociative Identity Disorder forum, hosted by tapatalk (2015)</ref> and it was appearing on Quora by 2016.<ref>[https://www.quora.com/Is-this-a-place-where-my-alters-can-vent-and-talk-too/answer/Alice-Vanish Is this a place where my alters can vent and talk, too?], reply by Alice Vanish on Quora, "7 years ago" (2016)</ref>


It's impossible to know how much of Subreality Café was fiction, exaggeration, or genuine. The story that originally spawned the concept, "Subreality Hopscotch," seems to have been a purely fictional piece,<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20010220000127fw_/http://www.subreality.com/sc/fics/sh.htm</ref> but all ideas expand. Most of the works are written in third person, which only complicates perspective more. Kielle, the site's creator, says in the author's note of "Subreality Chronicles" that she's not sure she wrote all of it, which lends itself to the plural end of the soulbond spectrum.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20010220001229fw_/http://www.subreality.com/sc/fics/schronicles.htm</ref> A work on Fanfiction.net from September 2000 stands out for its portrayal of fictives meeting in a room in the writer's head.<ref>https://www.fanfiction.net/s/67024/1/A-Pause-Before</ref> Some former Subreality members made LiveJournal posts about their fictives as sentient independently from their Subreality fics.<ref>https://dragonbat2006.livejournal.com/277324.html</ref><ref>https://dragonbat2006.livejournal.com/15510.html</ref>
A multiplicity glossary on [[wikipedia:Tumblr|Tumblr]] in 2011 defined fictive as, "A member of a system who originates from a work of fiction. This is a controversial term, and some find it offensive and prefer the term 'soulbond.'"<ref>[https://multiplicity101.tumblr.com/glossary glossary] on Multiplicity 101 on Tumblr, first archived 2012, accessed 2022</ref> The LivingPlural Tumblr account had a "fictive directory" in 2012<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20120509113316/http://livingplural.tumblr.com LivingPlural] on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2012  </ref> and had defined it as "a headmate based on a fictional character" by 2015.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20150117091800/http://livingplural.tumblr.com/Terms We all use different terms. Here’s a guide to them!] by LivingPlural on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2015 </ref> Also in 2012, a Tumblr user referred to fictives as being "common among multiples."<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20121124205458/http://livingplural.tumblr.com LivingPlural] on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2012 </ref> The Magneton System defined fictives as "just what they sound like: headmates who originated elsewhere and moved in here"<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20120509134724/http://wearemagneton.tumblr.com/members About Us] by wearemagneton on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2012</ref> or "a headmate based on a fictional character."<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20120509133835/http://wearemagneton.tumblr.com/faq FAQ] by wearemagneton on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2012</ref> The blog Fictive Talk, to which fictives could submit messages reaching out to each other, was probably created in 2012.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20120726083850/http://fictivetalk.tumblr.com/ Fictive Talk] on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine (2012)</ref> One Tumblr blog, which had a daily [[DID]] term definition, explained that, "a fictive is an alter that’s based on a fictional character. during trauma the mind will cling onto all possible positives and it isnt uncommon for fictional characters to jump to mind and influence the creation of an alter."<ref>[https://at.tumblr.com/underconstruction-did/daily-did-glossary/8e876r8wuq9e Daily DID Glossary: Fictive] by abbys-castle, reblog by underconstruction-did (2013)</ref>


"Walking in the Rain" has an introduction to the Subreality Café that is indispensable to understanding the origins of fictivity. "Muses are the source of a Writer's Inspiration. The Muse may be a good friend of the Writer, or a long-time enemy; either way, Muses are indispensible [sic] to the Writing community. Some Muses are specifically assigned to Writers, while others are simply imaginary friends that the Writer failed to outgrow."<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20010220001125fw_/http://www.subreality.com/sc/fics/witr.htm</ref>
The Amorpha System on Tumblr made a few posts looking back on the perspectives on fictives, then called other things, in the early 2000s.<ref>[https://amorpha-system.tumblr.com/post/36580013324/more-thoughts-on-fictivity-inspired-by-the-last More thoughts on fictivity, inspired by the last entry] by amorpha-system (probably sethrenn) on Tumblr, 2012</ref><ref>[https://amorpha-system.tumblr.com/post/55952282756/no-seriously-shut-up-id-like-to-take-a-moment-to We actually got accused of being "anti-fictive"] by amorpha-system on Tumblr, 2013</ref> "Actually, we had some longrunning debates in email in 2000, when we were still in the closet and trying to hide ourselves in the soulbonding community, about whether fictives (though they weren’t called fictives then) could be parts of 'real' plural systems."<ref>[https://amorpha-system.tumblr.com/post/34019272729/yelling-at-books-brings-back-memories-riel <nowiki>Yelling at books brings back memories. [Riel]</nowiki>] by amorpha-system on Tumblr, 2012</ref> Some plurals expressed concern that plurality was being equated with fictivity and being otherkin.<ref>[https://plures-blog.tumblr.com/post/26941226640/uuuuurgh UUUUURGH] by plures-blog (possibly Ex Uno Plures) on Tumblr (2012)</ref> Fictive ask blogs existed in 2013, leading to critiques about stereotypes around fictive roleplaying.<ref>[https://somehealthyskepticism.tumblr.com/post/41018784550/ask-fictive-frost-hi-there-my-names-jack Hi there! My name’s Jack.] by ask-fictive-frost, reblog with comment by somehealthyskepticism, on Tumblr, 2013</ref> Some Tumblr users criticized fictives as "roleplaying extremely hard" and being "uncreative at best."<ref>[https://shutthefuckupotherkin.tumblr.com/post/55611808959/id-like-to-take-a-moment-to-point-out-the I’d like to take a moment to point out the absolute uselessness of fictives on Tumblr.] by shutthefuckupotherkin on Tumblr, 2013</ref> Fictionkin and by association fictive identity has been accused of being based on theft.<ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/okamp-blog/25976584735/zukoherezukoherezukoherezukohere sorry but you can’t defend fictionkin/fictives.] by barkura, reblog by okamp-blog on Tumblr (2012)</ref> A 2013 kin manifesto was noted as being for "Otherkin, Fictionkin, Otakukin, Fictives, and all and sundry."<ref>[https://archive.ph/4qi5D Kin Manifesto For 2013 And Beyond] by general-jinjur on Tumblr, via Archive Today, 2013 </ref> A short essay was posted to Dreamwidth titled "are therians, otherkin, and fictives real?"<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20161130070237/https://jewelfox.dreamwidth.org/2013/08/16/are-therians-otherkin-and-fictives-real.html are therians, otherkin, and fictives real] by jewelfox on Dreamwidth, via Wayback Machine, 2013</ref>  


In 2001, plural Sethrenn posted on their LiveJournal about [[Soulbond|soulbonding]] and tagged it with "fictivity," though that may have been added later. "There's a limit, I think. Even in fan culture. You can only talk about SBs and characters in your head so far, only take it so seriously, before other people start to back off and write you off as a raving loony. [...] It's interesting how, on a much smaller scale, the backlash in the fan community against SBing in a way mirrors the psych backlash against multiplicity, doesn't it?"<ref>https://sethrenn.livejournal.com/829.html</ref> Subreality has an LJ community and has had it since 2001, which may explain the transition of terminology, especially after Subreality founder Kielle's death in 2005.<ref>https://subreality.livejournal.com/ </ref> Fictive was occasionally shortened to "fic."<ref>https://archiveofourown.org/works/12813/chapters/16378</ref>
A conversation about a "Tumblr nutcase" referenced "crazy tumblr [[Otherkin|otherkins]] and 'fictives'," specifically a definition more accurately labeled as fictionkin,<ref>[https://groups.google.com/g/sock_gryphon_group/c/eGZLhuGsYrQ/m/IJUeaLd_nNQJ very surreal when a tumblr nutcase is someone you know...] on the sock_gryphon_group mailing list, regarding FailFandomAnon on LiveJournal, 2012</ref> <ref>[https://fail-fandomanon.dreamwidth.org/35750.html?thread=162193830#cmt162193830 very surreal when a tumblr nutcase is someone you know...] from Fail-FandomAnon on LiveJournal, Dreamwidth mirror (2012)</ref> although other conversations had more accurate definitions,<ref>[https://groups.google.com/g/sock_gryphon_group/c/aFAHQjjlCa0/m/r3wjEEeDpNYJ Re: ITT: Ships you ship] on the sock_gryphon_group mailing list, regarding FailFandomAnon on LiveJournal, 2012</ref> and at one point fictive and factive were called "new words for otakukin."<ref>[https://fail-fandomanon.livejournal.com/37289.html?thread=167193257#t167193257 Re: factive/fictive?] comment on Were Velociraptors on the FailFandomAnon LiveJournal, 2012</ref> <ref>[https://fail-fandomanon.dreamwidth.org/74638.html?thread=199474318#cmt199474318 Re: Tumblr Gold] from Fail-FandomAnon LiveJournal, Dreamwidth mirror (2014)</ref> Members of the otherkin community in 2012 and 2013 referred to the term fictive as a "new way" to refer to soulbonds,<ref>[https://overlord-mordax.livejournal.com/404895.html crossposted from my tumblr] by overlord-mordax on LiveJournal, 2012</ref> <ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20140815060920/http://www.otakukin.proboards.com/thread/494/soul-bonds Soul Bonds] comment by Mordax-sama (probably overlord-mordax) on the More Than Fiction forum on proboards, 2013</ref> as did some FFA members.<ref>[https://fail-fandomanon.dreamwidth.org/32485.html?thread=145007845#cmt145007845 Re: Soulbonder House--Real or Hoax?] from Fail-FandomAnon on LiveJournal, Dreamwidth mirror (2012)</ref> A Tumblr blog called "fictives against fictives" accused other fictives of being illegitimate.<ref>[https://fail-fandomanon.dreamwidth.org/64015.html?thread=308277775#cmt308277775 Fictives against fictives] from Fail-FandomAnon on LiveJournal, Dreamwidth mirror (2013)</ref> Tumblr users associated fictives with "DID [[faking]]" as early as 2014.<ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/this-sure-is-a-blog/93525548160/do-not-accuse-people-of-faking-did Do not accuse people of faking DID.] by aboutdid, reference in reblog by aboutdid, reblog by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2014)</ref><ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/this-sure-is-a-blog/105662072670/did-confessions-submitted-by-anon-i-dont I'm really against fictives...] by did-confessions, reblog by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2014)</ref><ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/stellarvisionary/82357562186/a-subject-i-try-not-to-talk-about-much-if-i-can A subject I try not to talk about much, if I can help it.] by stellarvisionary on Tumblr (2014)</ref><ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/this-sure-is-a-blog/109829245855/do-more-people-with-did-and-mpd-have-fictives do more people with DiD and MPD have "fictives" than not?] by this-is-not-dissociative, reblog by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2015)</ref><ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/mikako-manko/114973827126/the-did-tag The DID-tag] by mikako-manko on Tumblr (2015)</ref><ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/this-sure-is-a-blog/122017815100/unabashedkinslayer-hydracorn-why-do-people Why do people even doubt fictives and non-human alters?] by unabashedkinslayer, reblog by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2015)</ref><ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/this-sure-is-a-blog/127442375715/how-can-you-tell-if-someone-is-faking-i-have How can you tell if someone is faking?] by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2015)</ref> The term was criticized for its association with the natural multiplicity (from which it was identified to have originated) and otherkin communities and for creating a distinction between fictional introjects and other kinds of introjects.<ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/this-sure-is-a-blog/125726259660/photo-post-image-description-a-photo this explanation is all well and good, but it doesn’t explain why there are “systems” on tumblr with several fictives from popular fandoms that only recently started.] by if-we-were-to-tell-the-truth, reblog with comment by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2015)</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20150715014415/http://this-is-not-dissociative.tumblr.com:80/ Why do people use the term Headmates, and why is it so darn annoying.] by this-is-not-dissociative on Tumblr (2015)</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20181213054917/http://this-is-not-dissociative.tumblr.com/page/152 In response to the Alter Types Master Post] by this-is-not-dissociative on Tumblr, "3 years ago" in 2018 archive (2015)</ref><ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/mikako-manko/120649335881/fictives Fictives] by mikako-manko on Tumblr (2015)</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20160507152430/http://if-we-were-to-tell-the-truth.tumblr.com:80/post/135464828800/whats-a-fictive-alter What's a fictive alter?] by if-we-were-to-tell-the-truth on Tumblr (2016)</ref>


In May 2002, DeadJournal user dende listed their interests as including "fanfiction, fictives," and "plushies named after fictives."<ref>https://dende.deadjournal.com/profile?mode=full </ref> The LiveJournal muse community wildfictives was created in October 2002 and is titled "The Fictional Characters in CK's Head." Individual characters had their own blogs and the description states that they are "all fictional" but "each have our own distinct personalities."<ref>https://wildfictives.livejournal.com/profile</ref> They would have long discussions, seemingly between the fictives, about their organization and leadership.<ref>https://wildfictives.livejournal.com/45532.html</ref> One post reads, "Y'know, I'm aware I'm fictional. All the things I've known and done and thought are just [[Source|a dream someone's dreamt]], no more tangible than a few pieces of paper, and some binary data... but I still [[Exomemory|retain ''memory'']]."<ref>https://wildfictives.livejournal.com/42694.html</ref> This community may be one of the first existing usages of the term fictive in a [[Plurality|plural]] sense, but there's no way of knowing how much of the content was simply roleplay.
It's on the first Plurality Resource glossary archive in 2014 as "a headmate who identifies with or believes they are, spiritually or psychologically, a person, creature, or race from fiction,"<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20140625122656/http://pluralityresource.org/glossary/ Glossary] on Plurality Resource, via Wayback Machine, 2014</ref> and it's been on the r/Plural glossary since its inception in late 2014, defined as "a system member who arrives in the system with the form, personality, and possibly psychological backstory."<ref>[https://www.reddit.com/r/plural/wiki/glossary/?v=a95982fa-d32f-11e4-ae1f-22000b2b8b44 Glossary edit] by Four-Point-Quandary on the r/Plural subreddit, "8 years ago" in Jan 2023</ref> A definition on Tumblr blog did-confessions said that fictives are "a type of alter that are influenced or taken from fictional works or places."<ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/did-confessions/105581404282/i-saw-this-word-here-fictives-could-you-explain I saw this word here: fictives.] by did-confessions on Tumblr (2014)</ref> Also in 2014, claims were made that fictive was a [[fictionkin]] term for someone who was kin with a specific character, as opposed to a species in general, seemingly based on earlier Tumblr definitions that they perceived as being replaced by a plural definition.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20161213054857/http://fictionkin.net/no-no-no-fictive-is-specific-character-4/ No no no. Fictive is specific character. Fictionkin is fictional species. Omg.] on From Fiction, via Wayback Machine, 2014</ref><ref>[https://fromfiction.fictionkin.org/2014/11/18/no-no-no-fictive-is-specific-character/ No no no. Fictive is specific character. Fictionkin is fictional species. Omg.] on From Fiction Archive, 2014</ref><ref>[https://www.tumblr.com/okamp-blog/105516067522/a-note-about-a-recent-misunderstanding a note about a recent misunderstanding] by okamp-blog on Tumblr, notable for referring to fictive as a headmate term as having "been like that from the start" (2014)</ref> A survey on Tumblr that began in May 2014 and was taken by 82 systems found that 51% of responders had fictives in their system.<ref>[https://solipsistful.tumblr.com/post/89025761960 Multiple Systems Survey Results!] by collective solipsism on Tumblr, "8 years ago" (2015)</ref><ref>[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vniyeERntilE05tYnwy8RzZ3HoAZcHP1BCDCtvb7qZE/edit#gid=0 multiple systems survey (Responses)] spreadsheet from collective colipsism</ref> An archive of a glossary from 2015 includes a definition of fictive, "A headmate who identifies with or believes they are, spiritually or psychologically, a person, creature, or race from fiction,"<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20151003211809/https://sites.google.com/site/monokromsystem/glossary Glossary] on the Monokrom System's site, via Wayback Machine (2015)</ref> and the first glossary archive from WikiPlural in 2016 defines a fictive as "a systemmate who believes that they are, in some way, from a work of fiction."<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20160821021503/https://wikiplural.net/glossary Glossary] on WikiPlural, via Wayback Machine (2016)</ref> An anonymous user with DID in a FailFandomAnon AMA in 2016 provided the following explanation of fictives: "fictional introjects (alters that appear as specific characters from pop culture and may or may not act like them) -- can happen, but a system can never be made up of all fictives. Furthermore, most fictives are earlier splits because a child is more fantasy prone. Splits that happen later tend not to produce fictives because the mind, however split it may be, has a grasp between the difference of reality and fantasy."<ref>[https://fail-fandomanon.dreamwidth.org/194995.html?thread=1067545011#cmt1067545011 Re: AMA (ask me anything)] from Fail-FandomAnon on LiveJournal, Dreamwidth mirror (2016)</ref>


The term was later adopted by other [[Plurality|plural]] groups, but it is unknown when exactly. It is now widely used beyond its original coinage. Some members of the multiplicity LiveJournal community discussed terms describing fictive and adjacent experiences in 2004, describing "fictives" as "oh, media people in your head."<ref>https://multiplicity.livejournal.com/170041.html</ref> One soulbonder using the tag "fictive" in 2005, and a few followed after,<ref>https://multiplicity.livejournal.com/327534.html</ref><ref>https://multiplicity.livejournal.com/tag/fictives</ref> and if it can be counted, "fictivity" was used in a comment in 2006.<ref>https://multiplicity.livejournal.com/582201.html?thread=8977721#t8977721</ref> There are records of similar concerns about "faking" fictivity in LiveJournal communities as have been prevalent recently.<ref>https://sethrenn.livejournal.com/197223.html</ref><ref>https://dreamwriteremmy.livejournal.com/132330.html</ref><ref>https://thebrokenarrows.livejournal.com/5904.html</ref> In 2009, an introduction in the pagan_multiples community identified many members of a system as fictives, clarifying that they "started as soulbonds."<ref>https://pagan-multiples.livejournal.com/2526.html</ref>
The term had a small presence in [[tulpamancy]] spaces. Discussion about Tumblr communities included a comment that "you can hardly find a multiple who doesn't also have a soulbond(or 'fictive')"<ref>[https://community.tulpa.info/topic/145-reaching-out-to-multiple-community/#comment-2659 I've seen tulpas mentioned on the tumblr, livingplural] by Ned Bigby on Tulpa.info (2012)</ref> A few forum users referred to their tulpas as being fictives<ref>[https://community.tulpa.info/topic/9033-socks-daydream-diary/page/13/#comment-55104 It would be something to worry about if all those were accidental, but, the newbies this time around were intentional.] by Sock on Tulpa.info (2013)</ref><ref>[https://community.tulpa.info/topic/9422-confessions-of-a-poorly-trained-tulpa/#comment-123308 Welcome to the Mistgod-Melian Megathread!] by Mistgod on Tulpa.info (2015)</ref> and a conversation in 2014 about soulbonding included a comment that "a lot of tulpas are also fictives,"<ref>[https://community.tulpa.info/topic/8928-the-difference-between-tulpas-and-soulbonds/#comment-118151 The Difference Between Tulpas and Soulbonds?] on Tulpa.info, comment by FallFamily, 2014</ref> but a member of the r/tulpa subreddit claimed they never saw fictive when they lurked in [[Tulpa]] spaces in 2013 and 2014,<ref>[https://www.reddit.com/r/Tulpas/comments/48us80/when_did_the_tulpa_community_namely_this_one/ When did the 'tulpa' community (namely, this one) start overlapping a bunch with other 'plural' communities?] by u/FriendlyScarecrow on the r/Tulpa subreddit, 2016</ref> so it was likely not a common term. Some tulpamancers on Tumblr used the term,<ref>[https://visionsofgray.tumblr.com/post/105262434133/excerpts-from-a-conversation-i-had-with-another Excerpts from a conversation I had with another tulpamancer on an ongoing discussion regarding terminology] by visionsofgray on Tumblr (2014)</ref> though, with it being applied to tulpas a few times,<ref>[https://visionsofgray.tumblr.com/post/115310159753/are-tulpas-of-fictional-characters-fictives Are tulpas of fictional characters fictives?] by visionsofgray on Tumblr (2015)</ref> which some members of the multiple community disliked.<ref>[https://visionsofgray.tumblr.com/post/114335360428/dreamingsystem-why-would-u-list-like-100-tulpas-n why would u list like 100 tulpas n tag it w/ “headmates” n “fictives” n shit like pls don’t] by dreamingsystem on Tumblr, reblog by visionsofgray (2015)</ref> Tulpa.io's glossary referenced fictives under their definition of [[walk-in]] in 2015.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20150613033737/https://tulpa.io/terminologies Terminologies] on Tulpa.io, via Wayback Machine (2015)</ref> It didn't seem to appear on Reddit until 2015 and 2016.<ref>[https://www.reddit.com/r/Tulpas/comments/2xijq5/comment/cp0iptx/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 The relationship between author and character isn't quite so cut-and-dried.] by Jas of jsheaforrest on the r/Tulpa subreddit (2015)</ref><ref>[https://www.reddit.com/r/Tulpas/comments/45g8w8/philosophy_friday_1_what_is_a_tulpa/ Philosophy Friday #1: What is a Tulpa?] by u/Falunel on the r/Tulpa subreddit (2016)</ref>


Pavilion added fictive under their definition of soulbond in mid-2008, which was mirrored on Astraea's Web.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20080915201316/http://www.karitas.net/pavilion/glossary.html</ref> At the same time, Astraea's Web altered their page on controversies to include the term fictive, which was defined as "a serious connection to a real presence with a fictional source" and pitted against soulbond.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20090517085825/http://www.astraeasweb.net:80/plural/controversy.html</ref> The first archive of Ex Uno Plures's glossary in 2009 redirects fictive to soulbond.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20090503123533/http://www.exunoplures.info/stickyterms.html</ref> Kasiya's personal site listed it in a 2008 archive as a recent synonym of soulbond that "we personally feel [...] is even worse."<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20081012033014/http://kasiya.net/site/files/g-general.html</ref> It was listed separately on Pavilion by 2009, based on Astraea's mirror,<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20090129080620/http://astraeasweb.net:80/plural/glossary.html</ref> where it was defined as a "person from fictional sources, who is adopted into the [[Headspace|mindspace]] of another person."<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20120121065925/http://www.karitas.net:80/pavilion/glossary.html</ref>
=== Modern ===
A September 2013 work showed that the usage of fictive as a type of muse was still surviving.<ref>[https://archiveofourown.org/works/892173 Girl of my Dreams] by Tracey_Claybon on Archive Of Our Own, 2013</ref> "Outspacer" was coined as a synonym for the plural term by Lightrayes in 2014.<ref>[https://thebrokenarrows.livejournal.com/5524.html 101514] by thebrokenarrows on LiveJournal, 2014</ref> By late 2014, the bastardized term "fictivekin" could be found on Tumblr,<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20150320185259/http://headmatesdontreal.tumblr.com/ headmates don't real] on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2015</ref> as could claims that fictive was coined by the early 2000s multiple community.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20151001000535/http://headmatesdontreal.tumblr.com/page/2 headmates don't real] on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2015</ref><ref>[https://bitcheshavebirthdays.tumblr.com/post/105870502183/slendykin-canine-alienesque-slendykin-hi if someone says they’re fictive and don’t like to use the term fictionkin for themselves, respect that.] reblog with comment by bitcheshavebirthdays on Tumblr, 2014


"Non-fictive" was being used alongside [[thoughtform]] on LJ in 2011.<ref>https://solipsistful.livejournal.com/9476.html</ref> Fictive was used in an October 2011 fanfic on Archive Of Our Own, which was also tagged with [[plurality]] and [[multiplicity]].<ref>https://archiveofourown.org/works/267858</ref> A multiplicity glossary on Tumblr in 2011 defined fictive as, "A member of a system who originates from a work of fiction. This is a controversial term, and some find it offensive and prefer the term 'soulbond.'"<ref>https://multiplicity101.tumblr.com/glossary</ref> The LivingPlural Tumblr account had a "fictive directory" in 2012<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20120509113316/http://livingplural.tumblr.com  </ref> and had defined it as "a headmate based on a fictional character" by 2015.<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20150117091800/http://livingplural.tumblr.com/Terms </ref> Also in 2012, a Tumblr user referred to fictives as being "common among multiples."<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20121124205458/http://livingplural.tumblr.com </ref> Members of the [[otherkin]] community in 2012 and 2013 referred to the term fictive as a "new way" to refer to soulbonds.<ref>https://overlord-mordax.livejournal.com/404895.html</ref> <ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20140815060920/http://www.otakukin.proboards.com/thread/494/soul-bonds</ref> It's on the first Plurality Resource glossary archive in 2014 as "a headmate who identifies with or believes they are, spiritually or psychologically, a person, creature, or race from fiction."<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20140625122656/http://pluralityresource.org/glossary/</ref> Also in 2014, claims were made that fictive was a [[fictionkin]] term for someone who kinned a specific character, as opposed to a species in general, seemingly based on earlier Tumblr definitions that they perceived as being replaced by a plural definition.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20161213054857/http://fictionkin.net/no-no-no-fictive-is-specific-character-4/</ref><ref>https://fromfiction.fictionkin.org/2014/11/18/no-no-no-fictive-is-specific-character/</ref>
</ref> An attempt to make a distinction between fictives and fictionkin stated that, "Fictives are walk-ins. Fictives appear in an already living body in this world fully aware and conscious of their identity as a certain character."<ref>[https://fromfiction.tumblr.com/post/128805455022/fictionkin-vs-fictives Fictionkin vs Fictives] by FromFiction on Tumblr, 2015</ref> In 2017, concerns arose around claims that "non-traumagenic systems aren’t allowed to use 'fictive'."<ref>[https://multiplicity-is-a-spectrum.tumblr.com/post/159422794132/apparently-the-newest-thing-going-around-is Apparently, the newest thing going around is that “fictive” is the same as “fictional introject”] by multiplicity-is-a-spectrum on Tumblr, 2017</ref> Now, fictive has even entered the medical sphere.<ref>[https://www.healthyplace.com/blogs/dissociativeliving/2018/02/fictional-introjects-in-dissociative-identity-disorder Fictive Alters in Dissociative Identity Disorder] by Crystalie Matulewicz on HealthyPlace, 2018</ref>


A September 2013 work showed that the usage of fictive as a type of muse was still surviving.<ref>https://archiveofourown.org/works/892173</ref> A month later, a [[DID]] multiple on LiveJournal defined "fictive" as being "ones designed off of fictional characters" in an explanation they cross-posted on the purged and unarchived profile "multipledidlife."<ref>https://nepherefirefly.livejournal.com/70475.html</ref> "Outspacer" was coined as a synonym for the plural term by Lightrayes in 2014.<ref>https://thebrokenarrows.livejournal.com/5524.html</ref> Now, fictive has even entered the medical sphere.<ref>https://www.healthyplace.com/blogs/dissociativeliving/2018/02/fictional-introjects-in-dissociative-identity-disorder</ref>
== Related Terms ==
== Related Terms ==
[[Introject]] is an umbrella term which includes fictives and factives, which can be considered medical and avoided by certain types of systems.<ref>http://www.karitas.net/pavilion/glossary.html#introject</ref> Though some systems consider the term to be open for use in a non-medical context, this term should not be used for systems without their consent.
[[Introject]] is an umbrella term which includes fictives and factives, which can be considered medical and avoided by certain types of systems.<ref>[http://www.karitas.net/pavilion/glossary.html#introject A Suggested Glossary] on Pavilion</ref> Though some systems consider the term to be open for use in a non-medical context, this term should not be used for systems without their consent.


[[Factive|Factives]] are headmates based on a non-fictional source, like another person.
[[Factive|Factives]] are headmates based on a non-fictional source, like another person.
Line 72: Line 96:
== Gallery ==
== Gallery ==
<gallery mode="packed">
<gallery mode="packed">
File:Lhz-fictive.png|[https://archive.ph/LfQMU Flag by localhazard]
File:Lhz-fictive.png|Flag by [https://archive.ph/LfQMU localhazard]
</gallery>
</gallery>


== References ==
== References ==
<references />
<references />

Revision as of 02:30, 17 March 2023

fictive ( n.)
Other formsfictivity (n.)
Synonymsfictional introject (n.), fiction-sourced (adj.)
Applies toheadmates

Fictives are headmates based on a fictional source. Common sources are media like games and books, but almost anything can be a fictive's source, such as original characters or D&D characters created by other system members.[1]

History

Origin

Fictive was previously thought to have been coined in the soulbonding community some time during or before 2004 as a less spiritual way of referring to soulbonds.[2][3][4] Recent discoveries have led to a much more complicated history.

In 1988, Jay Martin published Who Am I This Time?: Uncovering The Fictive Personality, a book unpacking how some of the greatest artists "[take] on aspects of fictional characters to compensate for deficiencies in themselves."[5] While likely not directly related to the creation of the plural term, it is worth mentioning. Martin's theory of the fictive personality was later explained as "[p]ropos[ing] that the fictive personality is a personality disturbance in which, in the relative absence or weakness of both normal narcissism and object love, the self strives toward total identification with characters in literary, historical, or mass-media fiction."[6]

A Pluralpedia editor found a usage of fictive on a fanfiction site. The work in question was first archived in 1999.[7] On the Fanlore page for fictive, there is a non-plural definition from 2009,[8] and from there one can be led to the Subreality Café.

Subreality Café

The first archive of the writing site Subreality Café, made in 1999, defines fictive in its FAQ as "characters from the stories for whom the Cafe was created."[9] The concept existed before the website existed, as early as 1997.[10]

"If you watched "Who Framed Roger Rabbit," you might get an idea of what fictives are like "off duty." They're like cartoon characters; they can't really die, it only looks that way in stories, but it can sure tick them off! The only thing a fictive truly fears is his/her writer and readers giving up on their story, thus letting them fade away into non-existence again."[9]

In this original definition, fictives are presented as ideas that grow to the point of near sentience. By late 2000, Subreality Café (then Subreality Central) had been redesigned twice, and the writing page now included sections for "Fictives Only," "Fictive/Writer Interactions," and "Fictives About Writers."[11][12] With these changes, it solidified the idea that fictives could act independently of their writers, but these stories were still generally portrayed as pure fiction.

A metafic titled "Ancient History" brings that a bit into question. "Theoretically, the muses of Subreality had been the basis for his muse. At least, he hoped so. He'd hate to think his mind had pulled her out of nowhere." Before long, Harry, the main character, came home to a girl in his room. The fic also brings up his realization that "all" fans were in some way mentally ill or neurotic.[13]

It's impossible to know how much of Subreality Café was fiction, exaggeration, or genuine. The story that originally spawned the concept, "Subreality Hopscotch," seems to have been a purely fictional piece,[14] but all ideas expand. Most of the works are written in third person, which only complicates perspective more. Kielle, the site's creator, says in the author's note of "Subreality Chronicles" that she's not sure she wrote all of it, which lends itself to the plural end of the soulbond spectrum.[15] A work on Fanfiction.net from September 2000 stands out for its portrayal of fictives meeting in a room in the writer's head.[16] Some former Subreality members made Livejournal posts about their fictives as sentient independently from their Subreality fics.[17][18]

"Walking in the Rain" has an introduction to the Subreality Café that is indispensable to understanding the origins of fictivity. "Muses are the source of a Writer's Inspiration. The Muse may be a good friend of the Writer, or a long-time enemy; either way, Muses are indispensible [sic] to the Writing community. Some Muses are specifically assigned to Writers, while others are simply imaginary friends that the Writer failed to outgrow."[19]

LiveJournal

Subreality has an LJ community and has had it since 2001, which may explain the transition of terminology, especially after Subreality founder Kielle's death in 2005.[20] The first mention of fictives in the community appears to have been in May, with it misspelled as "ficitive," in a post which has a comment referring to "how your ficitives get personalities and lifes of their own."[21] User Beverly McIntyre made a separate journal for her fictional character Dakota in early 2001, referencing SC in the post, and tagged it as fictives.[22] An earlier post of hers referenced a "fictive [fictional character]" being mad at her.[23] Subreality has been references a few times in soulbonding spaces on other sites, including Blurty[24] and SoulBond Sanctuary,[25] in these cases with nearly direct links to the extended multiple community. SoulBond Sanctuary also saw fictive being used as an adjective when describing soulbonds, with the creation of "fictive characters."[26]

In 2001, plural Sethrenn posted on their LiveJournal about soulbonding and tagged it with "fictivity," though that may have been added later. "There's a limit, I think. Even in fan culture. You can only talk about SBs and characters in your head so far, only take it so seriously, before other people start to back off and write you off as a raving loony. [...] It's interesting how, on a much smaller scale, the backlash in the fan community against SBing in a way mirrors the psych backlash against multiplicity, doesn't it?"[27] Fictive was occasionally shortened to "fic."[28]

In May 2002, DeadJournal user dende listed their interests as including "fanfiction, fictives," and "plushies named after fictives."[29] The LiveJournal muse community wildfictives was created in October 2002 and is titled "The Fictional Characters in CK's Head." Individual characters had their own blogs and the description states that they are "all fictional" but "each have our own distinct personalities."[30] They would have long discussions, seemingly between the fictives, about their organization and leadership.[31] One post reads, "Y'know, I'm aware I'm fictional. All the things I've known and done and thought are just a dream someone's dreamt, no more tangible than a few pieces of paper, and some binary data... but I still retain memory."[32] This community may be one of the first existing usages of the term fictive in a plural sense, but there's no way of knowing how much of the content was simply roleplay.

The term was later adopted by other plural groups, but it is unknown when exactly. It is now widely used beyond its original coinage. Some members of the multiplicity LiveJournal community discussed terms describing fictive and adjacent experiences in 2004, describing "fictives" as "oh, media people in your head."[33] One soulbonder using the tag "fictive" in 2005, and a few followed after,[34][35] and if it can be counted, "fictivity" was used in a comment in 2006.[36] There are records of similar concerns about "faking" fictivity in LiveJournal communities as have been prevalent recently.[37][38][39] A multiple on LJ in 2006 said that "there were places online where people didn't talk about multiplicity strictly in terms of trauma," but "other worlds, walk-ins, fictives and the like were rarely discussed at all."[40] In 2009, an introduction in the pagan_multiples community identified many members of a system as fictives, clarifying that they "started as soulbonds."[41] It was added to Fanlore's soulbonding page in October 2010, stating that it was used because soulbond "devolved from its original meaning into something casual and flippant."[42]

Empowered Multiplicity

Pavilion added fictive under their definition of soulbond in mid-2008, which was mirrored on Astraea's Web.[43] At the same time, Astraea's Web altered their page on controversies to include the term fictive, which was defined as "a serious connection to a real presence with a fictional source" and pitted against soulbond.[44] The first archive of Ex Uno Plures's glossary in 2009 redirects fictive to soulbond.[45] An essay archived from 2008 lists terms related to soulbonds, naming, "Soulbonds, Fictives, guests, non-humans, Furries, Otakukin, Otherkin, Therians, imaginary friends, archetypes, in-sourced, out-sourced, characters, role-playing, muses, and whatever else," but notes that fictive is reminiscent of "a fake person."[46] Kasiya's personal site listed it in a 2008 archive as a recent synonym of soulbond that "we personally feel [...] is even worse."[47] It was listed separately on Pavilion by 2009, based on Astraea's mirror,[48] where it was defined as a "person from fictional sources, who is adopted into the mindspace of another person."[49]

Tumblr

Dreamwidth user Tidepools said in 2010 that they were a multiple system with soulbonds/fictives.[50] "Non-fictive" was being used alongside thoughtform on LJ in 2011.[51] Tumblr user solipsistful identified their system as having fictives in (c.) 2012.[52] Fictive was used in an October 2011 fanfic on Archive Of Our Own, which was also tagged with plurality and multiplicity.[53] A 2012 article about Draven (infamous in some fandom spaces) defined fictive as "like an otherkin where the true, internal identity is a fictional character," with Draven identifying as a "fictive singlet."[54] A Tumblr conversation about soulbonder terminology considered "fictive" to be from the multiplicity community and showed preference for terms like outsourced and insourced, which they said were used by soulbonders.[55] Uses on Twitter existed but were primarily mocking and insulting.[56][57][58][59] The Tumblr tags fictive and fictives were seeing usage by multiples and fictionkin in 2011.[60][61] One early usage of the word on the PsychForums occured in 2012, in a list of terms taken from a glossary page of a DID site, used the term "fictive alter,"[62] but its first appearance seems to have been as a noun in December 2011.[63][64] It seems to have been introduced to the (unrelated) CwDID forum in 2015[65] and it was appearing on Quora by 2016.[66]

A multiplicity glossary on Tumblr in 2011 defined fictive as, "A member of a system who originates from a work of fiction. This is a controversial term, and some find it offensive and prefer the term 'soulbond.'"[67] The LivingPlural Tumblr account had a "fictive directory" in 2012[68] and had defined it as "a headmate based on a fictional character" by 2015.[69] Also in 2012, a Tumblr user referred to fictives as being "common among multiples."[70] The Magneton System defined fictives as "just what they sound like: headmates who originated elsewhere and moved in here"[71] or "a headmate based on a fictional character."[72] The blog Fictive Talk, to which fictives could submit messages reaching out to each other, was probably created in 2012.[73] One Tumblr blog, which had a daily DID term definition, explained that, "a fictive is an alter that’s based on a fictional character. during trauma the mind will cling onto all possible positives and it isnt uncommon for fictional characters to jump to mind and influence the creation of an alter."[74]

The Amorpha System on Tumblr made a few posts looking back on the perspectives on fictives, then called other things, in the early 2000s.[75][76] "Actually, we had some longrunning debates in email in 2000, when we were still in the closet and trying to hide ourselves in the soulbonding community, about whether fictives (though they weren’t called fictives then) could be parts of 'real' plural systems."[77] Some plurals expressed concern that plurality was being equated with fictivity and being otherkin.[78] Fictive ask blogs existed in 2013, leading to critiques about stereotypes around fictive roleplaying.[79] Some Tumblr users criticized fictives as "roleplaying extremely hard" and being "uncreative at best."[80] Fictionkin and by association fictive identity has been accused of being based on theft.[81] A 2013 kin manifesto was noted as being for "Otherkin, Fictionkin, Otakukin, Fictives, and all and sundry."[82] A short essay was posted to Dreamwidth titled "are therians, otherkin, and fictives real?"[83]

A conversation about a "Tumblr nutcase" referenced "crazy tumblr otherkins and 'fictives'," specifically a definition more accurately labeled as fictionkin,[84] [85] although other conversations had more accurate definitions,[86] and at one point fictive and factive were called "new words for otakukin."[87] [88] Members of the otherkin community in 2012 and 2013 referred to the term fictive as a "new way" to refer to soulbonds,[89] [90] as did some FFA members.[91] A Tumblr blog called "fictives against fictives" accused other fictives of being illegitimate.[92] Tumblr users associated fictives with "DID faking" as early as 2014.[93][94][95][96][97][98][99] The term was criticized for its association with the natural multiplicity (from which it was identified to have originated) and otherkin communities and for creating a distinction between fictional introjects and other kinds of introjects.[100][101][102][103][104]

It's on the first Plurality Resource glossary archive in 2014 as "a headmate who identifies with or believes they are, spiritually or psychologically, a person, creature, or race from fiction,"[105] and it's been on the r/Plural glossary since its inception in late 2014, defined as "a system member who arrives in the system with the form, personality, and possibly psychological backstory."[106] A definition on Tumblr blog did-confessions said that fictives are "a type of alter that are influenced or taken from fictional works or places."[107] Also in 2014, claims were made that fictive was a fictionkin term for someone who was kin with a specific character, as opposed to a species in general, seemingly based on earlier Tumblr definitions that they perceived as being replaced by a plural definition.[108][109][110] A survey on Tumblr that began in May 2014 and was taken by 82 systems found that 51% of responders had fictives in their system.[111][112] An archive of a glossary from 2015 includes a definition of fictive, "A headmate who identifies with or believes they are, spiritually or psychologically, a person, creature, or race from fiction,"[113] and the first glossary archive from WikiPlural in 2016 defines a fictive as "a systemmate who believes that they are, in some way, from a work of fiction."[114] An anonymous user with DID in a FailFandomAnon AMA in 2016 provided the following explanation of fictives: "fictional introjects (alters that appear as specific characters from pop culture and may or may not act like them) -- can happen, but a system can never be made up of all fictives. Furthermore, most fictives are earlier splits because a child is more fantasy prone. Splits that happen later tend not to produce fictives because the mind, however split it may be, has a grasp between the difference of reality and fantasy."[115]

The term had a small presence in tulpamancy spaces. Discussion about Tumblr communities included a comment that "you can hardly find a multiple who doesn't also have a soulbond(or 'fictive')"[116] A few forum users referred to their tulpas as being fictives[117][118] and a conversation in 2014 about soulbonding included a comment that "a lot of tulpas are also fictives,"[119] but a member of the r/tulpa subreddit claimed they never saw fictive when they lurked in Tulpa spaces in 2013 and 2014,[120] so it was likely not a common term. Some tulpamancers on Tumblr used the term,[121] though, with it being applied to tulpas a few times,[122] which some members of the multiple community disliked.[123] Tulpa.io's glossary referenced fictives under their definition of walk-in in 2015.[124] It didn't seem to appear on Reddit until 2015 and 2016.[125][126]

Modern

A September 2013 work showed that the usage of fictive as a type of muse was still surviving.[127] "Outspacer" was coined as a synonym for the plural term by Lightrayes in 2014.[128] By late 2014, the bastardized term "fictivekin" could be found on Tumblr,[129] as could claims that fictive was coined by the early 2000s multiple community.[130][131] An attempt to make a distinction between fictives and fictionkin stated that, "Fictives are walk-ins. Fictives appear in an already living body in this world fully aware and conscious of their identity as a certain character."[132] In 2017, concerns arose around claims that "non-traumagenic systems aren’t allowed to use 'fictive'."[133] Now, fictive has even entered the medical sphere.[134]

Related Terms

Introject is an umbrella term which includes fictives and factives, which can be considered medical and avoided by certain types of systems.[135] Though some systems consider the term to be open for use in a non-medical context, this term should not be used for systems without their consent.

Factives are headmates based on a non-fictional source, like another person.

Walk-ins and soulbonds can be some types of fictives and were formerly more synonymous.

Fictionkin can also involve considering oneself to be a fictional entity, but can be experienced by singlets. Fictives may identify as fictionkin if they choose. A fableing is a headmate within a median system who is identifies as both, or somewhere between, a fictive and a fictionkin.

Fictive-flux is when a headmate's connection to their source(s) varies over time. A post-fictive is someone who no longer identifies as what they were originally a fictive of.

A semi-fictive is someone who is partially a fictive in some way, while polyfictive or multifictive is someone who is made up of multiple fictional entities. Polyfictives and multifictives could be considered composites.

A system with many, or mostly, fictives can be called fictive-heavy.

Gallery

References

  1. Fictives on the Fictionkin Wiki, via Wayback Machine, 2021
  2. The history of the term fictive by LB Lee on Tumblr, reblog by the-truth-is-outthere, c. 2017
  3. A History of the Fictionkin Community by House of Chimeras on Weebly, via Wayback Machine, 2018
  4. MPD/DID Glossary on Astraea's Web, accessed 2022
  5. ‘Fictive Personalities’ : Author Looks for the Character in All of Us by Mike Wyma, about author Jay Martin, in the LA Times, 1988
  6. Clinical contributions to the theory of the fictive personality. by Jay Martin, listed on APA PsycNet, published 1984-1985
  7. When Fictives Attack by Mercutio on the Wolverine and Jubilee Page, via Wayback Machine, published 1999 and accessed 2022
  8. Fictive on Fanlore, accessed 2022
  9. 9.0 9.1 Subreality Central via Wayback Machine, 1999
  10. Subreality Setup Part 1/? by Kielle, in alt.comics.fan-fiction mailing list, 1997
  11. Subreality Central via Wayback Machine, 2000
  12. Subreality Central via Wayback Machine, 2000
  13. Ancient History by Bayeux and Tapestry on the Subreality Cafe, via Wayback Machine, 2001
  14. Subreality Hopscotch by Kielle on the Subreality Cafe, via Wayback Machine, 2001
  15. Subreality Chronicles by Anonymous on Subreality Cafe, via the Wayback Machine, 2001
  16. A Pause, Before by kerithwyn on Fanfiction.net, 2000
  17. Dear Fictives by dragonbat2006 on LiveJournal and Dreamwidth, 2015
  18. Do anybody else's fictives channel Gloria Swanson? by dragonbat2006 on LiveJournal and Dreamwidth, 2006
  19. Walking In The Rain by D^Knight on Subreality Cafe, via Wayback Machine, 2006
  20. Subreality fanfic group on LiveJournal, created 2001
  21. Ever want to tell a ficitive to go get laid? by Nisie in the Subreality community on LiveJournal, 2001
  22. Oh, what a beautiful mooorning. Oh, what a beautiful daayyyy. Something something sooooomething... by beverly-mcintyr on LiveJournal, 2001
  23. Hmm. Random thought. by beverly-mcintyr on LiveJournal, 2001
  24. [1] user profile on Blurty, via Wayback Machine, with tags "multiplicity," "soulbonding," and "subreality," 2005
  25. Page 2 of Soulbond Sanctuary forum in the Sword and Serpent Tavern, a message board with many ties to the multiple community and which features a number of comparisons and connections between the concepts, via Wayback Machine, 2003
  26. Re: Where does one start?, comment by Mousse9, in SoulBond Sanctuary on the Sword and Serpent Tavern forum, via Wayback Machine, 2001
  27. ...There's a limit, I think. by sethrenn on LiveJournal, 2001
  28. The Long Road by wanderlustlover on Archive Of Our Own, 2009
  29. dende's profile on DeadJournal, accessed 2022
  30. wildfictives community profile on LiveJournal, accessed 2022
  31. Right, then. Consensus time. by burntfeathers on the wildfictives LiveJournal, 2004
  32. I almost feel like throwing a tantrum today. by the5thwheel on the wildfictives LiveJournal, 2004
  33. Random question from an apparent "oldbie"... by eclectic on the multiplicity LiveJournal, via Wayback Machine, 2004
  34. On Names, Identities, and Soulbonding by our_haven on the multiplicity LiveJournal, 2005
  35. Fictives tag on the multiplicity LiveJournal, accessed 2022
  36. The problems with being fiction-sourced... comment by sethrenn on the multiplicity LiveJournal, 2006
  37. I dunno, maybe if we join this, it'll get people off the idea that we're biased against fictives in some way? by sethrenn on LiveJournal, 2006
  38. lots of things by dreamwriteremmy on LiveJournal, 2011
  39. 101714 by thebrokenarrows on LiveJournal, 2014
  40. FYI, the question about Javascript by sethrenn on LiveJournal, 2006
  41. Persona System introduction by thegathered on the pagan-multiples LiveJournal, 2009
  42. Soulbond (Trope) edit history 3 October 2010 by KTJ on Fanlore
  43. A Suggested Glossary on Pavilion, via Wayback Machine, 2008
  44. Controversial Issues in Multiplicity on Astraea's Web, via Wayback Machine, 2009
  45. Soulbonds, alters, headmates, people, colleagues, where does it end? And which ones should I use? by Hess on Ex Uno Plures, via Wayback Machine, 2009
  46. Essays - Conflicts with the word "Soulbonds" by LeAnne of the Silhouettes on Weebly, via Wayback Machine, written 2008, 2015
  47. Glossary on Kasiya, via Wayback Machine, 2008
  48. Multiple Personality Glossary on Astraea's Web, via Wayback Machine, 2009
  49. A Suggested Glossary on Pavilion, via Wayback Machine, 2012
  50. Nothing to see by tidepools on Dreamwidth, 2010
  51. our terminology by solipsistful on LiveJournal, 2011
  52. Continuing from yesterdaaay. by collective solipsism on Tumblr, "11 years ago" (2012)
  53. The Liberty by TheColorBlue (user-locked) on Archive Of Our Own, 2011
  54. From Otherkin to Transethnicity: Your Field Guide to the Weird World of Tumblr Identity Politics by Max Read on Gawker, 2012
  55. Terminology re-visisted. (Lee) by darkstarsystem, reblog by okamp-blog on Tumblr (2012)
  56. okay i had enough of soulbonding fictive mutltiple otherkin today by Pink_Poodle on Twitter (2012)
  57. seriously though the multiple/otherkin/fictive communities are toxic as fuck by thalassarche on Twitter (2012)
  58. dear tumblr by vhbonesy Twitter (2013)
  59. I am a fictive Chiss Sithlord otherkin temporarily slumming it in Corporate IT. by f0rf0r on Twitter (2013)
  60. Fictives tag on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2011
  61. Fictive on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2011
  62. Re: Question adressed to The Hawk by tomboy24 on the PsychForums forum for Dissociative Identity (2012), citing Terms for Dissociative Identity Disorder, first archive (2013)
  63. Re: Alters, when did you start naming them? by SinnyBaby on PsychForums, Dissociative Identity forum (2011)
  64. Re: Can alters come from media images?? by Caecandy on PsychForums, Dissociative Identity forum (2012)
  65. My name is Lily by Tea on the Coping with Dissociative Identity Disorder forum, hosted by tapatalk (2015)
  66. Is this a place where my alters can vent and talk, too?, reply by Alice Vanish on Quora, "7 years ago" (2016)
  67. glossary on Multiplicity 101 on Tumblr, first archived 2012, accessed 2022
  68. LivingPlural on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2012
  69. We all use different terms. Here’s a guide to them! by LivingPlural on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2015
  70. LivingPlural on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2012
  71. About Us by wearemagneton on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2012
  72. FAQ by wearemagneton on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2012
  73. Fictive Talk on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine (2012)
  74. Daily DID Glossary: Fictive by abbys-castle, reblog by underconstruction-did (2013)
  75. More thoughts on fictivity, inspired by the last entry by amorpha-system (probably sethrenn) on Tumblr, 2012
  76. We actually got accused of being "anti-fictive" by amorpha-system on Tumblr, 2013
  77. Yelling at books brings back memories. [Riel] by amorpha-system on Tumblr, 2012
  78. UUUUURGH by plures-blog (possibly Ex Uno Plures) on Tumblr (2012)
  79. Hi there! My name’s Jack. by ask-fictive-frost, reblog with comment by somehealthyskepticism, on Tumblr, 2013
  80. I’d like to take a moment to point out the absolute uselessness of fictives on Tumblr. by shutthefuckupotherkin on Tumblr, 2013
  81. sorry but you can’t defend fictionkin/fictives. by barkura, reblog by okamp-blog on Tumblr (2012)
  82. Kin Manifesto For 2013 And Beyond by general-jinjur on Tumblr, via Archive Today, 2013
  83. are therians, otherkin, and fictives real by jewelfox on Dreamwidth, via Wayback Machine, 2013
  84. very surreal when a tumblr nutcase is someone you know... on the sock_gryphon_group mailing list, regarding FailFandomAnon on LiveJournal, 2012
  85. very surreal when a tumblr nutcase is someone you know... from Fail-FandomAnon on LiveJournal, Dreamwidth mirror (2012)
  86. Re: ITT: Ships you ship on the sock_gryphon_group mailing list, regarding FailFandomAnon on LiveJournal, 2012
  87. Re: factive/fictive? comment on Were Velociraptors on the FailFandomAnon LiveJournal, 2012
  88. Re: Tumblr Gold from Fail-FandomAnon LiveJournal, Dreamwidth mirror (2014)
  89. crossposted from my tumblr by overlord-mordax on LiveJournal, 2012
  90. Soul Bonds comment by Mordax-sama (probably overlord-mordax) on the More Than Fiction forum on proboards, 2013
  91. Re: Soulbonder House--Real or Hoax? from Fail-FandomAnon on LiveJournal, Dreamwidth mirror (2012)
  92. Fictives against fictives from Fail-FandomAnon on LiveJournal, Dreamwidth mirror (2013)
  93. Do not accuse people of faking DID. by aboutdid, reference in reblog by aboutdid, reblog by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2014)
  94. I'm really against fictives... by did-confessions, reblog by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2014)
  95. A subject I try not to talk about much, if I can help it. by stellarvisionary on Tumblr (2014)
  96. do more people with DiD and MPD have "fictives" than not? by this-is-not-dissociative, reblog by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2015)
  97. The DID-tag by mikako-manko on Tumblr (2015)
  98. Why do people even doubt fictives and non-human alters? by unabashedkinslayer, reblog by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2015)
  99. How can you tell if someone is faking? by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2015)
  100. this explanation is all well and good, but it doesn’t explain why there are “systems” on tumblr with several fictives from popular fandoms that only recently started. by if-we-were-to-tell-the-truth, reblog with comment by this-sure-is-a-blog on Tumblr (2015)
  101. Why do people use the term Headmates, and why is it so darn annoying. by this-is-not-dissociative on Tumblr (2015)
  102. In response to the Alter Types Master Post by this-is-not-dissociative on Tumblr, "3 years ago" in 2018 archive (2015)
  103. Fictives by mikako-manko on Tumblr (2015)
  104. What's a fictive alter? by if-we-were-to-tell-the-truth on Tumblr (2016)
  105. Glossary on Plurality Resource, via Wayback Machine, 2014
  106. Glossary edit by Four-Point-Quandary on the r/Plural subreddit, "8 years ago" in Jan 2023
  107. I saw this word here: fictives. by did-confessions on Tumblr (2014)
  108. No no no. Fictive is specific character. Fictionkin is fictional species. Omg. on From Fiction, via Wayback Machine, 2014
  109. No no no. Fictive is specific character. Fictionkin is fictional species. Omg. on From Fiction Archive, 2014
  110. a note about a recent misunderstanding by okamp-blog on Tumblr, notable for referring to fictive as a headmate term as having "been like that from the start" (2014)
  111. Multiple Systems Survey Results! by collective solipsism on Tumblr, "8 years ago" (2015)
  112. multiple systems survey (Responses) spreadsheet from collective colipsism
  113. Glossary on the Monokrom System's site, via Wayback Machine (2015)
  114. Glossary on WikiPlural, via Wayback Machine (2016)
  115. Re: AMA (ask me anything) from Fail-FandomAnon on LiveJournal, Dreamwidth mirror (2016)
  116. I've seen tulpas mentioned on the tumblr, livingplural by Ned Bigby on Tulpa.info (2012)
  117. It would be something to worry about if all those were accidental, but, the newbies this time around were intentional. by Sock on Tulpa.info (2013)
  118. Welcome to the Mistgod-Melian Megathread! by Mistgod on Tulpa.info (2015)
  119. The Difference Between Tulpas and Soulbonds? on Tulpa.info, comment by FallFamily, 2014
  120. When did the 'tulpa' community (namely, this one) start overlapping a bunch with other 'plural' communities? by u/FriendlyScarecrow on the r/Tulpa subreddit, 2016
  121. Excerpts from a conversation I had with another tulpamancer on an ongoing discussion regarding terminology by visionsofgray on Tumblr (2014)
  122. Are tulpas of fictional characters fictives? by visionsofgray on Tumblr (2015)
  123. why would u list like 100 tulpas n tag it w/ “headmates” n “fictives” n shit like pls don’t by dreamingsystem on Tumblr, reblog by visionsofgray (2015)
  124. Terminologies on Tulpa.io, via Wayback Machine (2015)
  125. The relationship between author and character isn't quite so cut-and-dried. by Jas of jsheaforrest on the r/Tulpa subreddit (2015)
  126. Philosophy Friday #1: What is a Tulpa? by u/Falunel on the r/Tulpa subreddit (2016)
  127. Girl of my Dreams by Tracey_Claybon on Archive Of Our Own, 2013
  128. 101514 by thebrokenarrows on LiveJournal, 2014
  129. headmates don't real on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2015
  130. headmates don't real on Tumblr, via Wayback Machine, 2015
  131. if someone says they’re fictive and don’t like to use the term fictionkin for themselves, respect that. reblog with comment by bitcheshavebirthdays on Tumblr, 2014
  132. Fictionkin vs Fictives by FromFiction on Tumblr, 2015
  133. Apparently, the newest thing going around is that “fictive” is the same as “fictional introject” by multiplicity-is-a-spectrum on Tumblr, 2017
  134. Fictive Alters in Dissociative Identity Disorder by Crystalie Matulewicz on HealthyPlace, 2018
  135. A Suggested Glossary on Pavilion