Pluritan: Difference between revisions

From Pluralpedia, the collaborative plurality dictionary
(Reworded a bit, linked throughout and simplified links.)
(Added "Term" template.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Content Warning|about=gatekeeping and invalidation}}
{{Content Warning|about=gatekeeping and invalidation}}
{{Term
| term =
| image =
| alt =
| image caption =
| synonyms =
| forms =
| usage_noun =
| usage_verb =
| usage_adverb =
| usage_adjective = yes
| usage_system =
| usage_headmate =
| usage_function =
| form_noun =
| form_verb =
| form_adverb =
| form_adjective =
| coiner =
| origin =
}}


The term '''pluritan''', coming from "[[plural]]" and "puritan" describes plurals, who while not conventional [[system exclusionist]]s or endophobes, have narrow-minded or exclusionary beliefs on what constitutes a valid or healthy system.
The term '''pluritan''', coming from "[[plural]]" and "puritan" describes plurals, who while not conventional [[system exclusionist]]s or endophobes, have narrow-minded or exclusionary beliefs on what constitutes a valid or healthy system.

Revision as of 22:22, 7 September 2021


pluritan ( adj.)

The term pluritan, coming from "plural" and "puritan" describes plurals, who while not conventional system exclusionists or endophobes, have narrow-minded or exclusionary beliefs on what constitutes a valid or healthy system.

Examples

Here are some examples of pluritan beliefs, common in various sections of the plural communities.

  • Believing that systems have a size limit, and only a certain number of actual people can exist in a system
  • The belief that large systems are inherently dysfunctional, and shrinking system size is necessary for healing; may be accompanied by a belief that large systems must be distressed by their plurality
  • The insistence that people who are happy with their plurality are being disrespectful to those who are distressed by plurality
  • The beliefs that either non-disordered systems are superior to disordered ones, or that non-disordered ones are appropriating from disordered ones, irrespective of system origin
  • The belief that median systems are not fully plural, or are just singlets confused about their identity
  • The belief that plurality is inherently distressing, and systems cannot be happy with their plurality, or see it as a positive coping mechanism.
  • The belief that introject heavy systems are impossible and/or that systems with a lot of introjects from recent media must be fake

These beliefs may often be internalized, even of a system in question does not actually believe them, they may hold similar ideas about their own system as part of doubt or internalized bigotry.