System Exclusionist

From Pluralpedia, the collaborative plurality dictionary
Revision as of 15:41, 14 April 2021 by Pluralanomaly (talk | contribs) (Added clarification that not every system uses this term and why, and changed some wording to acknowledged system gatekeeping and sysmedicalism is similar but not the same. Sysmed also might have been based on traumascum, but we don't have where it was coined we just know the coiner.)
system exclusionist ( n., adv.)
Other formssysmedicalist (n., adv.)
Applies tosystems, headmates

A sysmed is an individual or system that adheres strictly to outdated and misapplied medical ideas about plurality and enforces those ideas on others, often in relation to causation. Sysmeds prioritize DID and OSDD-1 experiences over others, and/or do not believe in endogenic systems. They often disparage "inclusive plural spaces", including saying that DID/OSDD-1 systems don't belong within them.

Sysmeds are not those who believe that DID/OSDD-1 systems should have their own spaces, or that traumagenic plurality is different than other forms, as all experiences deserve their own communities.

History

The term "sysmed" is modeled after the term "transmed", as both follow the similar ideology: a certain phenomena is only valid if they fit precise medical definitions and ideal. The latter is short for "transmedicalism", and when used as a personal identifier, "transmedicalist". Though, system gatekeeping/pluralphobia did not come from transmedicalism.

Not every system uses the term sysmed due to not wanting to compare system gatekeeping and transmedicalism. This can be due to feeling that they aren't able to make the comparison or because they want to acknowledge differences between the two ideologies and histories.

Some systems also feel it may be too close to the term "traumascum" as it was coined with a similar idea, and avoid using it.

Sysmed is a noun but can be modified as an adjective ("that post was very sysmeddy").